Seal patches open-source vulnerabilities on the version you already run. No forced upgrade, no regression risk.
Seal patches the vulnerable code in place, on the version you already run, with no forced upgrade and no regression risk to core banking, payments, or trading systems. Every fix comes with the evidence your auditors and regulators ask for.
Every fix represents a finding closed without an upgrade, a migration, or a regression cycle.
* Engineering hours are estimated from CVEs patched multiplied by the average upgrade-and-regression effort avoided per fix.
Running Spring? See every Spring CVE Seal patches without an upgrade in the Spring CVE index.
Seal patches the vulnerable code inside the open-source version you already run and ships it as a sealed build of that same version, like spring-webmvc 5.3.39+sp4. There is no framework upgrade, no migration and no regression cycle.
It keeps your version number and adds a suffix such as +sp4. Only the vulnerable code changes: the average sealed patch is 6.5 lines, and the diff and signature are attached to every sealed package.
Nine: Java, Python, JavaScript, Go, Ruby, PHP, .NET, C/C++ and Linux packages, back through 25 years of release history, including versions whose maintainers stopped publishing.
Seal's SLA is 72 hours for every critical and high, from public disclosure to sealed package.
The same booking link books a call with the team.
Seal is not a GRC tool. It is the control that makes the remediation line in these frameworks true.
| Framework | Requirement | What Seal provides |
|---|---|---|
| DORAArt. 25, RTS on ICT risk | Vulnerability assessments, open-source analysis and remediation as part of digital operational resilience testing; oversight of third-party software. | Closes findings on third-party code within the entity's own SLA, with per-CVE remediation records suitable for competent-authority review. |
| PCI DSS 4.0Req. 6.3.1, 6.3.3 | Identify vulnerabilities in bespoke and third-party software; install critical patches within one month of release. | A patch exists on day one, not when the next major version ships. Patch logs map directly to 6.3.3 evidence. |
| NYDFS Part 500500.7, 500.16 | Vulnerability management with timely remediation based on risk; documented risk assessment. | Predictable, timely remediation on a 72-hour SLA for criticals and highs, so patching becomes a predictable process rather than a constant firefighting exercise. |
| FFIEC / OCCIT Handbook, Third-Party Risk | Patch management for internally developed and vendor-supplied software; evidence for examination. | Examination-ready inventory of which CVEs were fixed, how, and when, across in-house and vendor-delivered applications. |
| SOX ITGCChange management | Controlled, documented changes to systems supporting financial reporting. | A version-preserving patch is a minimal, reviewable change. Diff and signature are attached to every sealed package. |
